To: <wccusdtalk@yahoogroups.com>,
<March4Education@yahoogroups.com>
From: Marilyn Langlois <langlois-rine@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:42:47
Subject: [March4Education] child
abuse and collective punishment
On Nov. 22, students of Lina Praire
and Elizabeth Jaeger at Downer Elementary were told that their teachers
would be moved to another school on Monday Nov. 28. From reports
by parents and teachers, the students were emotionally devastated by this
news. Furthermore, the children will suffer mentally from the disruption
and set-back caused by this unnecessary change in teachers.
I am troubled that the district
appears to be entrenched in viewing the situation as a personnel issue
rather than pedagogical issue. I continue to call for dialogue on
all sides.
I am concerned that of all the possible
consequences the district could have imposed, they selected one that is
harmful to the students. I am concerned that unnecessarily removing
these two teachers from their classrooms at this time is a form of child
abuse (see below for clarification). Do we want to send children
the message that it's OK for people in positions of authority to inflict
avoidable emotional and mental suffering on them?
Taking the teachers away from their
students is collective punishment: the children are being punished for
something they didn't do. If the district insists on disciplining
the teachers, then discipline them, not the children. For example,
if the teachers don't want to leave the classroom to attend poor quality
in-services, then the district might consider assigning them the added
responsibility of planning, coordinating and implementing high quality
district-mandated in-services at their site.
May this be a learning experience
for us all,
Marilyn
------
From "The California Child Abuse
& Neglect Reporting Law: Issues and Answers for Mandated Reporters"
published by the California Dept. of Social
Services Office of Child Abuse
Prevention in May 2003:
- In California, certain professionals
are required to report known or suspected child abuse. Other citizens,
not required by law to report, may also do so. (Pg.1)
- The primary intent of the reporting
law is to protect the child. Protecting the identified child may also provide
the opportunity to protect other children. It is equally important
to provide help for the suspected abuser. The report of abuse may
be a catalyst for bringing about change... which in turn may lower the
risk of abuse. (Pg.1)
- "Mental suffering" in and of itself
is not required to be reported. However, it may be reported. Penal
Code 11166.05 states: "Any mandated reporter who has knowledge of
or who reasonably suspects that mental suffering has been inflicted upon
a child or that his or her emotional well-being is endangered in any other
way may report the known or suspected instance of child abuse or neglect
to an agency specified in Section 11165.9" (Pg.2)
- Facing Denial: It is common
for abusive caregivers to deny that they have been abusive. This
is to be expected. They have a great deal to protect, and they are
usually feeling judged and exposed. (Pg.19)
- Mandated reporters often feel
reticent to label behavior as abusive. They may feel they have no
right to pass judgment on other people. However, if a reasonable
suspicion exists, the protective action is beneficial to the caregivers
as well, who may not recognize their behavior as abusive, or may be reluctant
to seek help. (Pg.21)
- Dr. C. Henry Kempe, a pioneer
in the field of child abuse prevention, once said he would rather apologize
to a caregiver because he made a mistake about reporting the abuse, than
apologize to a damaged child because he did not report. It is better
to err in the direction of over-reporting than
under-reporting. (Pg.21)
The caregiver in question here is
WCCUSD. I'm not sure which individual or individuals are personally
responsible for ordering the transfer of Lina and Elizabeth: it could
be the Downer Principal (Ms. Uribe), the WCCUSD Personnel Director (Mr.
Krueger), the Regional Superintendent (Ms. Frison), or the Interim Superintendent
(Ms. LeBlanc). And, of course, the School Board is ultimately
responsible.
According to the Child Abuse Prevention
Council of Contra Costa County, Inc., the phone number for reporting any
case of suspected child abuse in West County is 510-374-3324 (Children
and Family Services). |